Your Pension – A Political Weapon

Rayne Rant
Nov 15, 2025
4 min read

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

November 15, 2025

By: Rayne Rant

In a betrayal of fiduciary duty to include potential criminal malfeasance with a heavy dose of incompetence, carefully shrouded behind a thin veneer of virtue signaling, California's massive public pension fund, CalPERS, poured taxpayer dollars into a so-called Green New Deal investment fund—only to watch it disappear. “State employees lost a staggering 71% of their $468 million investment in a clean energy and technology private equity fund, state records show, but CalPERS (The California Public Employees' Retirement System) won’t explain how” Kenneth Schrupp - The Center Square.

These Green New Deal "investments" aren't about saving the planet—they're a blatant grift machine. A Bernie Madoff-level fraud on a governmental scale, returns that could have been secured by simply parking the money in a standard, low-risk investment pool but instead were put into funding the climate hysteria machine to California pensioners' detriment. Now, it is California taxpayers who will be forced to foot the bill through higher taxes, increased fees/regulations, and diminished access to services. Investment losses of this size equate to criminal misconduct and abuse of taxpayer funds, all in the name of climate-worshipping sustainability and resilience that is bankrupting and destroying the state.

The basic grift – Politicians and public officials are funneling public funds into obscure companies owned by their wealthy business partners and associates, who then cycle the cash right back into election war chests. The only "green" being pushed is the color of the money lining insiders' pockets, all while everyday Californians suffer skyrocketing energy bills and cost-of-living crises engineered by these failed climate policies.

How did this happen and how did CalPERS find themselves in the middle of this?

Enter in Marcie Frost, the CEO of CalPERS (pension boss turned globalist insider) gambling away public pension funds in failed green investments to bankroll politically connected “sustainable” projects, enriching insiders while laundering influence, money and policy edicts through the Net-Zero, climate fantasy, grift-machine network we call the Council for Inclusive Capitalism.

What is the Council for Inclusive Capitalism and why should we care?

The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is a public, private-partnership with the following stated goal: To “harness the private sector” to advance “inclusive capitalism” – a rebranded version of stakeholder capitalism, prioritizing ESG metrics over shareholder returns. The statement of their guiding principles reveals their work is centered around achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which are euphemistically named mechanisms for societal control via surveillance.

Resembling a criminal syndicate but operating as an NGO/501(c)3, the Council for Inclusive Capitalism is an elite club where billionaire CEOs, Vatican officials (yes, Pope Francis, who lectured on climate while flying private jets was instrumental in the execution of this plan), and public-pension managers meet to redirect trillions in capital toward ideological goals—at the expense of ordinary investors and taxpayers.

Translation: The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is a “woke capital” alliance, ESG cartel that merges big business with progressive social engineering under the veil of morality while pushing climate mandates, DEI policies, and globalist agendas. Public pension funds are utilized to bankroll politically connected “sustainable” projects that enrich insiders all while shielding executives from accountability.

However, when looking at what was said (when they thought no one was listening), the real objective becomes clear as evidenced by a statement made in May of 2014 at the Conference on Inclusive Capitalism:

A “cosmetic” fix to the global elite’s concern with “the widespread erosion of confidence in capitalism” and how this would affect their bottom line. The goal – to reimagine and re-market capitalism to the masses. Don’t take my word for it, here it is in their own words: “if such reforms are not pursued, global capitalists will be overthrown by the very populations currently overwhelmingly marginalized by their self-serving activity. The way for businesses to “combat such views—and help themselves in the process—by taking specific steps to make capitalism more inclusive. Yes, ‘inclusiveness’ has been invoked in pursuit of dubious social-engineering ends, but in this case, it is appropriate to describe what businesses can do...”

Translation: “Inclusive capitalism” is a PR marketing scam to trick the average citizen into accepting the subjugation and control that is planned for us. The globalists acknowledge their activities are "self-serving" and therefore, they are rightfully concerned about the public’s ability to stand up against their attempts to socially engineer us into a compliant and obedient herd of docile, willing subjects.

The Bottom Line: Your Pension Is a Political Weapon

It turns out, CalPERS was quietly embedding itself as a “Steward” (as they were gambling away retirement funds) in what turns out to be a Vatican-backed, global elite, invitation-only Council for Inclusive Capitalism club. They are co-authors of global ESG policy and voting away your retirement dollars inside a framework launched by Pope Francis and Rothschild heiress Lynn Forester de Rothschild.

If you have ever wondered why California enthusiastically pursues failing climate projects that accelerate California’s descent into a dystopian, third-world, authoritarian hell-scape, look no further than its anointed grifters leading the way. CalPERS aims to have $100 billion invested in climate solutions by 2030 thus creating an incentive to continue fanning the flames of a non-existent crisis in order to justify their existence – all while growing their wealth and influence through a $100 Billion Climate Action Plan.

All of this is happening outside the purview of the voter, the Constitution and the legislative process as these policies are enacted at the agency level via non-elected bureaucrats (like Marcie Frost) inside a network that wants to: