What We Know About Fetterman Wants Trump Pardoned — Says New York Case Against Him Was Politically Motivated

Senator John Fetterman has publicly expressed his view that former President Donald Trump should be pardoned for the 34 felony charges related to falsifying business records in New York, arguing that the case against Trump was politically motivated. Here's what we know based on recent discussions:

Fetterman discussed this on "The View," where he suggested that both the case against Hunter Biden and the New York trial against Trump were instances of political motivation. He believes that in both scenarios, a pardon would be appropriate to restore public confidence in legal institutions and prevent their weaponization against political figures.

Fetterman's stance is that the legal actions against Trump in New York were not solely based on legal merits but were influenced by political agendas. This view aligns with sentiments expressed by many of Trump's supporters and some political analysts who argue that such legal actions could set a precedent for future politically motivated prosecutions.

Fetterman emphasized the need for maintaining the integrity of legal institutions, suggesting that these high-profile cases have damaged public trust in these systems. He argues that by pardoning Trump, there could be an opportunity to heal the divide and reinforce the notion that justice should not be influenced by political affiliations.

While some might agree with Fetterman's perspective as a means to move past political vendettas, others, including figures like Joy Behar from "The View," have countered that such an argument could be used to justify pardons for other politically sensitive convictions, like those related to the January 6th Capitol rioters. This indicates a broader debate on the implications of pardoning political figures for politically charged offenses.

The New York case against Trump involved charges of falsifying business records related to payments intended to silence allegations of affairs during his 2016 campaign. Critics of the case argue that it's a stretch of legal interpretation, whereas supporters believe these actions indeed meet the criteria for legal action.

The discussion around pardoning Trump, particularly in relation to the New York case, reflects ongoing debates about the intersection of law, politics, and justice in high-profile political figures' legal battles.