What Is Known About States Resist Trump’s Mass Deportation Plans: California, New York, Maryland and Colorado Push Back

Several states, including California, New York, Maryland, and Colorado, are actively preparing to resist President-elect Donald Trump's mass deportation plans. Here's what is known about their actions:

California has been dubbed a "Sanctuary State" and is preparing legal challenges to counter Trump's deportation plans. The state has laws like the "California Values Act," which limits local law enforcement's cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for immigration enforcement purposes. 

The state has also seen the formation of advocacy groups and legal preparation for potential lawsuits against federal policies that might infringe on state rights or individual rights, particularly for immigrants. California's Attorney General has expressed readiness to use all legal tools available to protect immigrants.

New York is exploring legislation like the "New York for All Act" to limit cooperation between local law enforcement and ICE, aiming to create a protective environment for immigrants. 

There are discussions around reintroducing the "Dignity Not Detention Act," which would ban state government agencies from engaging in immigration detention, further complicating federal efforts to deport undocumented immigrants within the state.

While specific actions from Maryland aren't detailed in the provided context, the state's general stance aligns with other blue states in preparing to resist federal overreach on immigration issues. This often includes legislative measures to protect undocumented immigrants and limit state-level cooperation with ICE.

Colorado's leaders have similarly vowed not to assist with mass deportations. The state has been proactive in establishing itself as a sanctuary state, with policies in place to protect immigrants, although the specifics of their pushback against Trump's plans weren't explicitly outlined in the provided search results.

These states are focusing on legal strategies, including preparing lawsuits against potential federal actions deemed unconstitutional or inhumane. They are also looking into legislative measures to limit or prevent local and state law enforcement from participating in immigration enforcement.

Advocacy groups are mobilizing to inform and prepare immigrant communities, providing emergency plans for those at risk of detention or deportation, focusing on rights awareness and community support.

The resistance is not only legal and legislative but also involves public sentiment and activism, with these states traditionally being more liberal and supportive of immigrant rights, often pushing back against what they perceive as harsh federal immigration policies.