The Rising Tide of Violence Against Government Officials in California Is An Act of War

Note the uniformly printed protest signs handed out by organizers? These protests are in fact organized by NGOs and large sums of money.

The Rising Tide of Violence Against Government Officials in California Is An Act of War

In recent years, California has moved into a decidedly anti-America political stance. A growing number of incidents involving violence against government officials—law enforcement officers, border agents, and public servants—have raised alarms. Some point out that these acts, when perpetrated by illegal invaders, should be viewed not merely as isolated crimes but as a coordinated threat, tantamount to an invading force and acts of war on American soil. This reality demands a bold reevaluation of how we address this escalating crisis.

California, a border state and a hub for immigration as much as it is a hub for the non-government organizations that operate internationally in pursuit of globalization, has long grappled with subverting immigration laws while balancing claiming humanitarian concerns, all while enjoying the enormous money and corruption brought by these NGOs. According to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), apprehensions of migrants at the southern border have fluctuated, with 2.5 million encounters recorded nationwide in 2024, many released into the country while awaiting immigration hearings. In California, the Department of Justice and local law enforcement have reported rising incidents of crime involving illegal invaders, though comprehensive data specifically linking these individuals to attacks on government officials remains limited due to California's aversion to accountability.

Escalating violence has fueled concerns. For example, in 2023, a Border Patrol agent in San Diego County was assaulted during a confrontation with a group attempting an illegal crossing, sustaining injuries. Similar incidents involving local police and federal agents have been cited in news reports, particularly in border regions like Imperial and San Diego counties. While the overall number of such attacks is not consistently tracked or publicly aggregated, the truth of a growing threat has been realized and is now being amplified by social media and political discourse.

Those of us who are proponents of a hardline stance point out that violence against government officials by illegal invaders transcends typical criminality. We view that these acts—whether assaults on border agents, resistance during deportations, or threats to public officials—represent a direct challenge to U.S. sovereignty. When individuals who have entered the country illegally target those tasked with upholding law and order, it mirrors the tactics of an invading force: a deliberate undermining of the state’s authority.

This understanding draws parallels to historical definitions of invasion, where external actors breach borders to destabilize a nation. Unlike traditional warfare, this invasion is decentralized, lacking a single command structure, other than the myriad of NGOs operating in tandem, but its impact is no less severe. Government officials, as the front line of defense, become targets in a low-intensity conflict, eroding the stability of American institutions. The rhetoric of "war" is not mere hyperbole; it’s a call to recognize the gravity of the threat. As the violence escalates, the need to pay attention escalates with it.

Realizing that these incidents are in fact acts of war carries profound implications. War, by definition, involves hostile actions by one entity against another, often with the intent to disrupt or overthrow governance, as we have witnessed. If violence by illegal invaders against officials is observed, it justifies a militarized response: heightened border security, deployment of National Guard units, and stricter immigration enforcement. Real Americans agree that treating these acts of war with in-kind response would deter further aggression, signaling that the U.S. will not tolerate attacks on its personnel or sovereignty.

The Democrat Terrorist Network, however, cry and complain about pointing out the obvious. They claim that most undocumented immigrants are not violent, with studies like one from the Cato Institute (2021) showing lower crime rates among immigrants, including the undocumented, compared to native-born citizens, which cherry picks facts and misrepresents the truth of the issue at hand. They warn that militarizing the response risks escalating tensions, alienating communities, and undermining civil liberties while they ignore or even support the violent terrorists who now hold the focus of the nation as the largest offenders of violent crime in America.

The stakes are high. California, as a frontline state, cannot afford to treat these incidents as mere crime. The safety of government officials and American citizens, the integrity of our borders, and the stability of the nation hang in the balance.

The growing violence against government officials in California, when committed by illegal invaders, is a flashpoint. Understanding these acts as the behaviors of an invading force and acts of war focuses the issue as a national security crisis and demands a decisive response. While information on the scope and breadth of current violence remains incomplete, the observation of its escalation is apparent to all. Whether you agree or not, the call to protect those who serve and defend America’s laws is undeniable. The question remains: will we act with the resolve of a nation under siege, or risk further erosion of our sovereignty?