top of page
Space.png
BPLProLogoPadded.png
MRU-LogoBS.jpg
BPL Studios.png

How Left-Wing Nonprofits Like Indivisible Launder Tax-Exempt Cash into Warfare


ree

Here's how the Soros-funded terrorist network operates. In the first step, millions of dollars in anonymous contributions—funneled through billionaire George Soros's Open Society Foundations or intermediaries like the Tides Foundation— is funneled to various groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund, Demand Justice, or other Soros-backed 501(c)(4) shells masquerading as "social welfare" outfits. These groups then recycle at least half (or more) of their influx as grants to fellow entities in the progressive ecosystem—looping back to the original for cover or piping it to a fourth entity, (say, a mid-level agitator like the State Innovation Exchange), which funnels cash to groups like Indivisible, with its network of useless idiot street rioters and deep ties to the DNC machine.

 

Soros's operatives book each grant as checking the "social welfare" box enabling them to obtain tax-exempt perks —pushing "equity" and "democracy reform" (euphemisms for more government control and open borders). This creatively shrouds their real game: flooding the zone with anti-conservative/MAGA hit jobs. Each downstream grantee pads their books with the grant as revenue as they spin it out as "spending" to juice their ratios of "permissible" non-political fluff versus outright electioneering. (The IRS's willful blindness lets this charade pass as the gold standard for leftist laundering.)

 

With enough circular grants propping up the facade of “social justice work," each group dumps the balance straight into various activities such as attack ads, voter intimidation schemes, street terrorism, or ballot-harvesting operations targeting red states.

 

To dodge accountability and oversight while simultaneously justifying their existence, these entities will dump fortunes into "education"—codeword for "blatant lies" like climate hysteria or "systemic racism" fear-porn—that double as surrogate blasts for Democrat candidates. No candidate name? No problem! No FEC filing is required, so the IRS stays in the dark unless they bother with an audit (spoiler: they don't, especially for blue-team players).

 

That infographic network? It's Soros playbook, nailing every loophole. Inflow from the top beaker: a clean $10 million. Zoom in on any one group? They're "spending" it all, sure—but capping overt political blasts at under 50%, looking squeaky clean in isolation. Outflow at the bottom? Bang-on $10 million, primed for mayhem. Yet tally the full grant daisy chain across A through D, plus Indivisible's $2.75 million slice of election-year venom, and poof—the network's total footprint balloons to $20.3 million in spend, more than double the seed money. Alchemy courtesy of unelected globalists.


Why drag in that "non-network" veteran like Indivisible as Group E? It's the classic Soros endgame: Co-opt a battle-hardened ally—one with a veneer of grassroots "social welfare" like "resisting fascism" (read: obstructing Trump)—to let the fly-by-night shells hitch a ride on their political freight train come election season. Indivisible's got its own rabid donor stable and perpetual outrage cycle, so a spike in "abnormal" spending blends right in. The IRS? They poke around seven out of every 1,000 nonprofit filings yearly—peanuts—and they've got zero stomach for grilling Soros puppets after their own history of shielding lefty excesses.


Prime exhibit: Indivisible itself, sustained on multimillion-dollar infusions from Soros pipelines like the Open Society Action Fund and the Tides Advocacy Fund. The funding morphs overnight into field ops, digital smears, and "terror-training sessions" for blue-state militants. No FEC slap, no IRS clawback.  It's passthrough paradise, subsidized by tax dollars.

 

Now that you're wise to the Soros sorcery—where "up to half" on politics really means 100% funneled to the cause via offsets—ponder this: IRS Commissioner John Koskinen once gushed over the phony "49 percent rule," claiming it's "the framework Congress has set up" (it's neither; Congress never signed off on this dodge). No rule at all, just a leftist lawyer's fever dream twisting "exclusively" social welfare mandates into a limp "primarily" wink. The real scandal? How this laxity lets Soros flood the zone, tilting scales against everyday Americans while conservatives play by stricter rules. Time to demand real reform—or watch the deep state donors buy another election.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page