Democrats Policy Is To End The United States

Democrats Policy Is To End The United States

These days, more of the Democrat Party’s actions and rhetoric are drawing sharp criticism from a significant portion of the American populace. America sees that the Democrats, backed by influential non-governmental organizations (NGOs), are engaged in a concerted effort to maintain and grow control over the federal government, despite widespread public rejection of their destructive and anti-American policies. This struggle is pushing the nation toward a dangerous precipice—one that could lead to civil conflict and expose the United States to external threats.

Polls and public sentiment tell the story.   A majority of Americans are appalled at the Democrat Party’s direction. Surveys, such as those from Gallup and Rasmussen Reports in 2024 and 2025, show sharply declining approval for Democrat leadership, with key issues like immigration, economic policy, and cultural initiatives driving voter frustration. These policies are prioritizing globalism, open borders, and progressive social engineering over national sovereignty and traditional values and have alienated a broad swath of the electorate.

Despite electoral setbacks, the Democrat Party has doubled down on its strategies, leveraging institutional power, media influence, and NGO terrorist activity support to maintain control. Judicial activism favoring progressive ideologies, and partnerships with NGOs to advance policy goals through violence and propaganda are evidence of a refusal to cede power. Organizations like the Open Society Foundations, Indivisible Project, Action Networks and various activist groups are amplifying Democrat messaging and funding initiatives that undermine American interests.

The rhetoric (propaganda) emanating from Democrat leaders and their NGO allies has grown increasingly confrontational and permissive to violence, further deepening the national divide. Statements from prominent Democrats framing political opponents as “threats to democracy” or “extremists” have been mirrored by NGOs that label conservative movements as dangerous. This rhetoric dehumanizes over half of the population, casting dissenters as enemies to be fought rather than fellow citizens with differing views. Such language risks escalating political disagreements into existential conflicts, setting the stage for all-out war.

These actions, combined with NGOs’ advocacy for escalating violence, have revealed to America that the Democrats are prioritizing control of power over the nation’s well-being.

The notion of a second American civil war, once dismissed as hyperbole, has gained traction in public discourse. Many are now discussing their concerns that Democrats terrorist stance on politics will lead to all out violent conflict.

Democrats and their NGO allies are woefully unprepared for the consequences of such a conflict. The party’s base, concentrated in urban areas and reliant on institutional power, lacks the grassroots resilience and armed capacity of its opponents, who are often rural, conservative, and heavily armed. Data from the National Firearms Survey (2021) estimates that 32% of Americans own firearms, with higher ownership rates among conservative-leaning demographics. More so, a group of people who refuse to consider the ramifications of their notions and the outcomes that result are not people prepared for direct conflict where the people involved must be capable of thinking on their feet to survive.

The Democrats’ focus on disarming citizens and defunding police, as seen in policies advocated by groups like Black Lives Matter and progressive terrorist NGOs is a fantasy that will lead to the confrontation they seek to protect themselves from. The irony, the very policies they intended to consolidate power will render the Democrats incapable of defending it in their own chaotic scenario.

The gravest concern is the vulnerability this internal division creates for the United States on the global stage. A nation fractured by ideological strife is an inviting target for foreign adversaries. Geopolitical analysts point to powers like China, Russia, and Iran as potential opportunists waiting to exploit American weakness. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has warned that internal instability would embolden adversaries to pursue aggressive actions, from cyberattacks to territorial encroachments in allied regions.

Many claim that the Democrats, by knowingly pursuing policies that weaken the nation and inflame divisions, are acting as enemy combatants against the United States. This perspective hinges on the argument that their actions—whether through negligence or intent—directly undermine national security and sovereignty. Legal scholars, however, note that such a designation would require clear evidence of treasonous intent, as defined by Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which is difficult to substantiate absent overt acts of war or collaboration with foreign enemies.  Though it must be noted that the majority of Americans believe Democrats are in fact operating on behalf of foreign adversaries with knowledge and intent to do so and that there has been more than sufficient indications to warrant investigation.

Nevertheless, the betrayal is potent. For Americans, the Democrats’ alignment with NGOs who operate on either stolen and laundered money or from the subsidies of foreign nations and their policies seen as anti-American displays their disloyalty.

The United States stands at a crossroads. The Democrat Party’s push to retain power is driving a wedge between Americans, inviting civil unrest and exposing the nation to external threats.