Facts Known About James O’Keefe Releases FEMA Investigation Part 1: “FEMA Doesn’t Want These People” – Human Bones Found in Storm’s Wreckage
- Boiling Point Live
- Dec 6, 2024
- 2 min read

James O'Keefe, a controversial conservative activist and founder of Project Veritas, recently released Part 1 of an investigative series focusing on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) response to Hurricane Helene in North Carolina. Here are some key points from this investigation:
The investigation highlights what O'Keefe claims to be a lack of adequate response by FEMA to the devastation caused by Hurricane Helene, suggesting that certain communities might not be receiving the help they need.
There are allegations that FEMA has been instructed to skip over homes displaying Trump signs, a practice reportedly not limited to Florida but also occurring in the Carolinas. This has led to claims of political discrimination in disaster relief efforts.
One of the most shocking findings mentioned in O'Keefe's investigation is the discovery of human bones in the storm's wreckage. A resident named Tammy Kelly showed O'Keefe these bones, explaining that local authorities advised letting them float away, possibly assuming they were from a cemetery. However, the presence of human remains in the debris underscores the severity of the disaster and the issues with recovery efforts.
The investigation touches on the significant role of volunteers in the cleanup and rebuilding process, noting that organizations like All Hands and Hearts are involved in the physical cleanup, while FEMA's financial support seems lacking.
Posts on X (formerly Twitter) show a range of reactions from users urging others to watch the video to expressing dismay at the findings, particularly regarding the human bones, although specific X posts are not quoted here.
James O'Keefe's investigations have often been met with criticism regarding their methodology and the accuracy of their content, suggesting that while the findings can highlight issues, they should be approached with a critical eye towards potential bias or selective reporting.
Comments